In this post, we’ll look at how to register a business in Kolkata. Company registration is a procedure through which all businesses are registered on the MCA’s website (Ministry of Corporate Affairs). The Company Registration in Kolkata is a simple procedure, but it requires numerous procedures to complete.

A Private Limited Company offers its stockholders legal protection and limited liability. A privaely held limited firm must have at least positions two working directors. A person can be both a director and a shareholder in a Private Limited Company. After receiving a Certificate of Incorporation, a Private Limited Company (PLC) can begin operations. Within 15 days following its application, a PLC can be implemented.

As a result, we will concentrate on the advantages and procedures of forming a Private Limited Company registrationin Kolkata in this post.

Advantages of forming a private firm company registration in Kolkata

1. A private limited company might have anything from two to fifty directors.
2. It is a legal autonomous body.
3. Directors have limited liability and are not directly responsible for the company’s operations.
4. Directors are only partially liable to creditors.
5. In the event of a default, the bank or creditors will sell the company’s assets rather than personal property.
6. The directors are eligible for tax benefits.
7. Suing or being sued in the name of a registered corporation is possible.
8. Companies that are registered have a higher chance of borrowing money.

Company Registration in Kolkata: Private Company Incorporation Checklist

• Directors: For private company registration in Kolkata, a minimum of two directors is required, with one of them being a resident director.
• The investment must be made in accordance with the business type, and there is no minimum capital investment necessary for a firm.
• Inventive business name: The name of the firm must not be identical or confusingly similar to that of another company.
• Registered address: Every business should have one.

Steps for Incorporation of the Company

The following are the stages of forming a business using the RUN form:

1. After that, create a login account and log in.
2. Enter the name you want to use and cross-reference it with the MCA database.
3. If an established business wants to reverse its name, a CIN will be requested through the RUN e- form.
4. The applicant must specify the name that he or she wishes to keep on file in case the firm’s name is changed or a new company is formed.
5. Then he or she must submit the prospective company’s objects as well as any additional documents in support of the suggested name.

Limited Name Validity

• For a new corporation, an authorised name is valid for 20 days from the date of approval.
• 60 days after the date of authorization for changing the name of an established corporation.

Steps for Private Company Registration in Kolkata

Step 1: Obtain DSC

Because the process is online, a digital signature is required for the incorporation of a private limited company. Members and executives must have a legitimate Class II or Class III DSC.

Step 2: Fill out an application for a DIN number.

A directors must have a DIN and must apply for one on MCA if he does not already have one. A DIN number can be used to become a director in many businesses.

Step 3: Submit an application for name approval

At the time of establishment, the company’s name, as well as SPICe (INC-32) must be submitted for approval. If the name is rejected, it can be resubmitted.

Step 4: e-MoA (INC-33) and e-AoA are the fourth and final steps (INC-34)

Previously, MoA and AoA had to be filed physically, but now they must be filed online on the MCA website. These papers must be digitally signed by the subscribers.

Step 5: PAN and TAN applications

After all of the paperwork have been completed, the applicant should consider applying for a PAN and TAN.

Step 6: Certificate of Incorporation 

MCA & RoC will analyse all of the documentation and issue a Certificate of Incorporation if they are pleased. The Certificate of Incorporation is a legal document that grants the firm legal standing.

7th Step: Open bank Accounts

The firm must create a bank account for any transactions in its name after receiving the certificate of incorporation.

In order to register a company in Kolkata, you’ll need the following documents

Documents required for company registration  in Kolkata:

1. For DSC 
2. DIN (Director Identification Number)
3. Incorporation of a Business

In the case of DSC,

1. Along with the DSC application form, the following papers must be forwarded:
2. The claimant’s photograph (to be stamped across with a blue pen)
3. The director’s address proof (s)
4. Id Proof (Pan Card) of the applicant Passport Aadhar card Driving licence Voter Id card Email Id and contact number (for each director)

DIN

Fill out the e-form DIR -3, which is available on the MCA website. Alongside Form DIR -3, attach the supporting information:

1. Id proof photo of the applicant (attested)
2. Proof of address (attested)
3. Make the payment as directed. The only way to pay is on the internet.
4. There will be a preliminary DIN created.
5. A preliminary DIN becomes an authorised DIN after verification.

• For a Firm’s Registration
• The Firm’s Title
• The firm’s assets
• Investors’ list
• The director’s Id proof is the company’s purpose (s)

1. Aadhar card and passport
2. Id cards for voters and driver’s licence
3. Director’s proof of residence (s)
4. Bank statement Telephone bill
5. The cost of electricity
6. Mobile phone bill (not old than two months)
7. INC-9 Director(s) Consent (form DIR-2) (Affidavit)

• Proof of the registered office’s address

1. Bills of Gas, 
2. Phone, and
3. Electricity

If the office is included in the lease, the lease agreement and a letter of authorization from the owner are required.

Holders of DINs declare themselves

A Private Limited Company Registration in Kolkata is an online operation that should be completed with caution, and once completed, the directors are entitled to all of the privileges of a Private Limited Company.

The post Private Limited Company Registration in Kolkata Via Online Method appeared first on MUDS.

Releases from the RBI Monetary Policy 2022 Meeting: The six-member Monetary Policy 2022 Committee (MPC), led by Reserve Bank of India (RBI) Governor Shaktikanta Das, maintained the repo rate at 4% and the reverse repo rate at 3.35 % intact. Here’s what the governor of India’s central bank said.

RBI Monetary Policy 2022: The Reserve Bank of India’s (RBI) Monetary Policy 2022 Committee (MPC) retained the repo rate at 4% for the 11th straight approach achieves a ‘affiliative posture,’ according to RBI Governor Shaktikanta Das on Friday.

The MPC decided unanimously to continue the accommodating approach, according to the central bank governor, and the reverse repo rate was also remained steady at 3.35 percent.

The Marginal Standing Facility (MSF) rates and the lending rate were likewise held steady at 4.25 percent.

On May 22, 2020, the RBI reduced its policy repo rate, or short-term lending rate, in an off-policy cycle to boost demand by decreasing interest rates to a historic low.

In a press conference following the Monetary Policy 2022 meeting, Das stated that the RBI will return the liquidity adjustment facility (LAF) corridor to 50 basis points (bps), as it was pre-Covid. The MSF rate and the bank rate remain at 4.25 percent.

“It also agreed to remain accommodating while concentrating on withdrawal of accommodation to ensure that inflation remains within the goal moving ahead, while encouraging expansion,” 

-he added on the central bank’s attitude.

” It will continue to be part of the RBI’s toolbox, and its use will be at the discretion of the RBI for objectives that are indicated from time to time. The FRRR, in conjunction with the SDF, will increase the flexibility of the RBI’s liquidity management framework.”

The RBI reduced its growth prediction for the current fiscal year to 7.2 percent from 7.8 percent previously, while increasing its inflation forecast to 5.7 percent from 4.5 percent.

He went on to say that, given the inordinate volatility in international oil prices as of early February, as well as the extreme uncertainty surrounding the evolving geopolitical tensions, any projection of growth and inflation is fraught with risk, and is largely dependent on future oil and commodity price developments.

Das addressed liquidity and financial market circumstances in his speech, stating that the RBI will continue to take a sophisticated and agile approach to liquidity risk management while preserving appropriate liquidity in the system.

“At the moment, liquidity management is distinguished by two procedures: variable rate reverse repo (VRRR) bids of varied maturities to swallow liquidity, and variable rate repo (VRR) auctions to fill temporary liquidity problems and offset anomalies.” “We will keep taking this strategy,” he stated.

ATM cash withdrawal without a card that is interoperable

In an effort to combat fraud, the Reserve Bank of India agreed on Friday to allow all banks to use card-less cash withdrawal through ATMs. Currently, card-less cash withdrawal via ATMs is a permissible form of transaction allowed by a few banks in the nation on an as-needed basis (for their customers at their own ATMs).

Economic experts and market analysts reacted as follows:

• The severe reduction in GDP forecasts for FY23 and significant increase in inflation expectations for FY23 might suggest some tightening measures in the future, which would be supported by the shift in posture to focus on withdrawal of accommodation. Current geopolitical developments, supply chain concerns, and commodity price increases are tying the RBI’s hands and pushing it to progressively turn hawkish, despite its desire to maintain its pro-growth perspective. The 10-year Gsec yield has increased to 7%, showing the street’s worry over the massive borrowing programme in the face of rising interest rates.”
• “Retaining the repo rate at 4% and the reverse repo rate at 3.35 percent, continuing with the accommodating posture on expected lines,” said V K Vijayakumar, Chief Investment Strategist at Geojit Financial Services. Recognizing the new reality of increased petroleum prices caused by the war, the RBI cut the FY23 GDP growth rate prediction to 7.2 percent from 7.8 percent before and upped the FY23 CPI inflation projection to 5.7 percent from 4.5 percent previously. This is predicated on the premise that crude will be $100 per barrel. This suggests that if crude falls considerably, which is likely if the conflict ends soon, GDP and inflation will improve.The opposite might be true if the battle escalates and petroleum prices rise well beyond $100. The Governor correctly underscored India’s macroeconomic fundamentals, noting to an improvement in the external position aided by record exports, large foreign reserves of $608 billion, and banking sector development. The SDF (Standing Deposit Facility) is a new mechanism established by the central bank to absorb liquidity. 

“The recent RBI Monetary Policy 2022 did not include any surprises,” stated Nish Bhatt, Founder & CEO of Millwood Kane International, “it held rates constant for the 11th straight policy.” However, it has clearly outlined the road to policy unwinding. The emphasis will now be on withdrawing the accommodating policy stance in order to keep inflation under control. The RBI’s statement today plainly suggests the end of loose Monetary Policy 2022, which is reflected in the 10-year benchmark yield, which has reached a multi-year high. The unwinding of liquidity will cause some instability, and it is expected that the RBI would drop the growth rate prediction for FY23 to 7.2 percent, with the inflation target raised to 5.7 percent from 4.5 percent previously. The explicit goal of central banks throughout the world is to manage inflation, unwind lose money, and concentrate on gradual and steady development.“

The post New Monetary Policy 2022: Repo Rate Remained Unchanged appeared first on MUDS.

Sexual harassment law: The word “workplace” confers to the Sexual harassment at workplace of Women at Workplace (Regulation, Prevention, and Redressal) Posh Act of 2013, and specifically includes:

The post POSH Act: ALL ABOUT THE SEXUAL HARASSMNET LAW IN INDIA appeared first on MUDS.

Based on the massive drive undertaken by the Ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA), Government of India, around 2.24 lakh companies have been struck-off by the Registrar of Companies throughout India for remaining inactive for a period of two (2) years or more. Following the action of striking-off of defaulting companies, restrictions have been imposed on the operation of their bank accounts in accordance with the law. Apart from the restrictions on bank accounts, action has also been taken to restrict the sale and transfer of moveable and immoveable properties of struck-off companies until they are restored. The State Governments have been advised to take necessary action in this regard by disallowing registration of such transactions.

The Prime Minister’s Office has constituted a Special Task Force (STF) under the Joint Chairmanship of Revenue Secretary and Secretary Corporate Affairs, to oversee the drive against such defaulting companies with the help of various enforcement agencies. The Special Task Force has so far met five (5) times and action has been initiated against several defaulting companies, which is expected to help in the drive against black money. The Registrar of Companies has been given power under section 248 to remove names of companies from its register after giving reasonable opportunity of being heard.

The Relevant Provisions of Section 248 have been briefly reproduced below

Section 248. (1) Where the Registrar has reasonable cause to believe that—
(a) a company has failed to commence its business within one year of its incorporation [or]
(c) a company is not carrying on any business or operation for a period of two immediately preceding financial years and has not made any application within such period for obtaining the status of a dormant company under section 455,
he shall send a notice to the company and all the directors of the company, of his intention to remove the name of the company from the register of companies and requesting them to send their representations along with copies of the relevant documents, if any, within a period of thirty days from the date of the notice.
(4) A notice issued under sub-section (1) shall be published in the prescribed manner and also in the Official Gazette for the information of the general public.
(5) At the expiry of the time mentioned in the notice, the Registrar may, unless cause to the contrary is shown by the company, strike off its name from the register of companies, and shall publish notice thereof in the Official Gazette, and on the publication in the Official Gazette of this notice, the company shall stand dissolved.
(6) The Registrar, before passing an order under sub-section (5), shall satisfy himself that sufficient provision has been made for the realization of all amount due to the company and for the payment or discharge of its liabilities and obligations by the company within a reasonable time and, if necessary, obtain necessary undertakings from the managing director, director or other persons in charge of the management of the company:
Provided that notwithstanding the undertakings referred to in this sub-section, the assets of the company shall be made available for the payment or discharge of all its liabilities and obligations even after the date of the order removing the name of the company from the register of companies.
(7) The liability, if any, of every director, manager, or other officers who was exercising any power of management, and of every member of the company dissolved under sub-section (5), shall continue and may be enforced as if the company had not been dissolved.
As & when the Companies are struck off only because of the fact that the Companies have not filled their Financial Statements or Annual Return for a continuous period of three years appears to be harsh on such Companies & its stakeholders especially in such cases where the companies are carrying on their businesses. The ROcs assumes that such defaulting companies are not carrying on any business only on the pretext of default in filing the financial statements /Annual return. This gives rise to some genuine companies carrying on a business having to default in Annual filings being struck off from the Register of Companies. Now the natural question which arises in such cases is the Restoration of Such Companies. In the Register of Companies, the MCA has given the NCLT window to such companies. To restore back the name of a struck-off Company a company has to follow the provisions of Section 252 read with Rule 87A of NCLT rules 2016. The restoration, as and when it happens, would be reflected in the official records by way of change in the status from ‘struck off’ to ‘active’

The provisions of Section 252 and Rule 87A of NCLT Rules have been briefly reproduced below

Section 252. (1) Any person aggrieved by an order of the Registrar, notifying a company as dissolved under section 248, may file an appeal to the Tribunal within a period of three years from the date of the order of the Registrar and if the Tribunal is of the opinion that the removal of the name of the company from the register of companies is not justified in view of the absence of any of the grounds on which the order was passed by the Registrar, it may order restoration of the name of the company in the register of companies:
Provided that before passing any order under this section, the Tribunal shall give a reasonable opportunity of making representations and of being heard to the Registrar, the company and all the persons concerned:
Provided further that if the Registrar is satisfied, that the name of the company has been struck off from the register of companies either inadvertently or on the basis of incorrect information furnished by the company or its directors, which requires restoration in the register of companies, he may within a period of three years from the date of passing of the order dissolving the company under section 248, file an application before the Tribunal seeking restoration of name of such company.
(2) A copy of the order passed by the Tribunal shall be filed by the company with the Registrar within thirty days from the date of the order and on receipt of the order, the Registrar shall cause the name of the company to be restored in the register of companies and shall issue a fresh certificate of incorporation.
(3 ) If a company, or any member or creditor or workman thereof feels aggrieved by the company having its name struck off from the register of companies, the Tribunal on an application made by the company, member, creditor or workman before the expiry of twenty years from the publication in the Official Gazette of the notice under sub-section (5) of section 248 may, if satisfied that the company was, at the time of its name being struck off, carrying on business or in operation or otherwise it is just that the name of the company be restored to the register of companies, order the name of the company to be restored to the register of companies, and the Tribunal may, by the order, give such other directions and make such provisions as deemed just for placing the company and all other persons in the same position as nearly as may be as if the name of the company had not been struck off from the register of companies.

Rule.87A. of NCLT Rules –

(1) An appeal under sub-section (1) or an application under subsection (3) of section 252, may be filed before the Tribunal in Form No. NCLT 9, with such modifications as may be necessary.

(2) A copy of the appeal or application, shall be served on the Registrar and on
such other persons as the Tribunal may direct, not less than fourteen days before the date fixed for hearing of the appeal or application, as the case may be.

(3) Upon hearing the appeal or the application or any adjourned hearing thereof, the Tribunal may pass appropriate order, as it deems fit.

(4) Where the Tribunal makes an order restoring the name of a company in the register of companies, the order shall direct that-

(a) the appellant or applicant shall deliver a certified copy to the Registrar of Companies within thirty days from the date of the order;
(b) (b) on such delivery, the Registrar of Companies do, in his official name and seal, publish the order in the Official Gazette;

(c) (c) the appellant or applicant do pay to the Registrar of Companies his costs of, and occasioned by, the appeal or application, unless the Tribunal directs otherwise; and
(d) (d) the company shall file pending financial statements and annual returns with the Registrar and comply with the requirements of the Companies Act, 2013 and rules made thereunder within such time as may be directed by the Tribunal.

REVIVAL OF STRUCK OFF COMPANY BY NCLT –Procedural Aspects

FIRST STEP – Preparation & Filling of Petition: (Rule 87A (1))

The petition under Section 252(3) for the restoration of the name of struck Company shall be filed with the Tribunal (NCLT).  The petition shall be filed in Form No. NCLT-9.
(Form NCLT 9 See Annexure 1)
List of Documents to be attached with application in NCLT-9:-
Annexure B of NCLT Rules, 2016 provides the list of documents required to be filed with NCLT while filing an application under various sections. As per Point No. 13 of Annexure B “Wherever no documents are prescribed to be attached with the application or petition, documents as mentioned below may be attached, as applicable.”
SL. No.
Particulars

I. Notice of Admission

II. Company Petition

III.Copies of Certificate of company incorporation, Memorandum, and Articles of Association, & Master data

III. Copy of Notification dated (STK 5 Notice STK 7 Strike off as the case may be.)

IV. Evidence regarding payment of Fee DD 1000

V. Affidavit Verifying the Petition

VI. Evidence regarding the filing of pending Balance Sheets and Annual Returns along with challans.
Earlier Filed ITR For all the years.

VII. Evidence that Company has been carrying its business
Details of major transactions during previous years

VIII. Undertakings if any

IX. Copy of Vakalatnama / Memorandum of Appearance

While drafting the petition the main focus should be on two things

(a) To repudiate the claim of ROC that the Company Is not carrying on the business or ceased to be in business for the past two years
(b) To show a valid cause why the company has not responded to the notice STK 5 under section 248. At the same time company has to shadow a valid cause as to why It has defaulted in filing the Financial statements & Annual Returns.

SECOND STEP – Submission of Petition with ROC: (Rule 87A(2))

A copy of the application shall be served on the Registrar of Companies and on such other persons as the Tribunal may direct, not less than 14 days before the date fixed for hearing of the application.

THIRD STEP: Hearing by Tribunal: (Rule 87A(3))

NCLT shall hear the Petitioner and Respondent (ROC). It will also take note of the observations/ objections, if any, received. After hearing from both the Parties, if it is satisfied, it can order the restoration of the name of the company in the record of the ROC.

FOURTH STEP: directions by Tribunal (Rule 87A(4))

Where the Tribunal makes an order restoring the name of a company in the register of companies, the order shall direct that-
(a) the appellant or applicant shall deliver a certified copy to the Registrar of Companies within thirty days from the date of the order;
(b) on such delivery, the Registrar of Companies do, in his official name and seal, publish the order in the Official Gazette;
(c) the appellant or applicant do pay to the Registrar of Companies his costs of, and occasioned by, the appeal or application unless the Tribunal directs otherwise; and
(d) the company shall file pending financial statements and annual returns with the Registrar and comply with the requirements of the Companies Act, 2013 and rules made thereunder within such time as may be directed by the Tribunal.

FIFTH STEP– FILING OF ORDER WITH ROC

The Company shall file the copy of the order with the Registrar of Companies within a period of 30 days from the date of the order.

SIXTH STEP– PUBLICATION OF ORDER IN OFFICIAL GAZETTE

The Registrar of Companies does, in his official name and seal, publish the order in the Official Gazette.

SEVENTH STEP– FILING OF PENDING FINANCIAL STATEMENTS & ANNUAL RETURN

The company shall file pending financial statements and annual returns with the Registrar and comply with the requirements of the Companies Act, 2013 in this regard.

The post Removal of Names of Companies from Register of Companies – Impact & Remedies appeared first on MUDS.

Have you ever contemplated what could be the best way to remove directors’ disqualification? if you are a director, then you must be wondering what you can do to remove your disqualification and what will be the most suitable way? 

Of course, it depends on what you want out of your career. If you want to remain a director of the old company, then you might need to revive the company first. if you just want to remove disqualification and continue directorship in other firms then there are other ways. Let us find out what is the most suitable way to remove director disqualification for any director. 

Rules for Directors’ Disqualification

The Companies Act of 2013 required companies to furnish documents related to their finances and operations every year. Defaulting on submission of these documents for a continuous period of three years had stricter provisions of punishment compared to the previous version of the Companies Act. The act considered the director of the company responsible for the actions of the company and so, has a policy of strict actions against them in case their company defaults. 

The directors of the company are responsible for the smooth operation of the company and therefore they are responsible for any action taken by the company that leads to failure in complying with the directions of the Government. The following points will give information on rules or issues which can lead to directors’ disqualification,

• Any directors of the company who have been convicted under section 188 by the Court regarding party transactions during the last five years. 
• The Court also has the authority over the disqualification of directors’ who are undischarged insolvent. 
• If any court or tribunal has earlier ordered the disqualification of the director. 
• If the directors fail to inform about their respective shares in any company held by them alone or in collaboration. 
• If the director is convicted in any offense by the Court and sentenced to imprisonment for more than 6 months.
• If the organization fails to redeem any debentures on their due date or fails to pay the interest due.
• If the company of the director has not filed its financial statements and annual returns for three years consecutively. 
• Failure to pay the declared dividend and continuing so for one year or more could also lead to disqualification of the company’s director. 
• If the company has failed to repay the deposit made to it or pay interest on those deposits. 

• If any director has applied for his/her adjudication as an insolvent or if the directors’ application for the same is still pending. 
• If any Court confirms that the director is not of sound mind. 

Analysing Court’s View on Writ Petitions through a Case

Let’s understand how filing a Writ Petition can help in the removal of directors’ disqualification and how Karnataka High Court responded to such petition through the case of Yashodhara Shroff v. Union of India, WP No. 52911 of 2017.

In this case, the High Court Said, “the directors of the struck-off companies under Section 248 of the Act do not per se get disqualified. But, if the said company has also not complied with Section 164(2)(a) of the Act, then the said company being a defaulting company, the directors of such a company get disqualified.”

Order of Karnataka High Court:

• Where the disqualification of the petitioners is based on any financial year “before 01-04-2014 as well as subsequent thereto” while reckoning the continuous period of three financial years under Section 164(2)(a) of the Act, irrespective of whether the petitioners are directors of public companies or private companies, such a disqualification was considered bad in law, and the Writ Petitions are allowed in such cases.
• For cases whose disqualification occurred under the provisions of Companies Act 1956 for directorship in Public Companies, the disqualification stands. 
• The DINs of directors whose disqualification has been removed by the court should be reactivated. 
• If the director is disqualified by considering financial years before 2014 and for private companies only, the disqualification will not be removed.

This case paved the way for other directors to file for relief in the High Court if they want to remove disqualification without the revival of their company. Even after the CODS was over, filing of the Writ petition to remove directors’ disqualification is still the proven way to end the exile for directors. 

Remedies for Directors’ Disqualification

During the initial few years of introduction of the new Companies Act, it was a common understanding that there was no remedy available for directors who are disqualified by RoC.  It was thought that waiting for the five years exile period to end is the only way to resume directorship work. However, there was another option which encompassed the revival of the disqualified company after struck off from RoC. Once the company is revived, its directors could also apply for the revival of their role. There were about 2.4 companies that were axed by the Ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA) using the Companies Act in 2017. These companies started exploring the options for their revival and the directors hoped to get their DIN reactivated. When the MCA came up with the Condonation of Delay Scheme 2018, the company’s directors hoped to get their company revived without paying heavy penalties and apply for their disqualification removal.

This year, the Ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA) has introduced Companies Fresh Start Scheme, 2020 or CFSS  The scheme offers companies struck off from RoC a one time opportunity of applying for condonation of their failure to comply by the norms (delay of filling the various documents, forms, returns, etc. with the Registrar). Let’s understand the benefits offered under this scheme,

Benefits to Avail in Companies Fresh Start Scheme

Revival of any struck-off company with a complete fee waiver on the application and no penalty for non-compliance.

An immunity period of 6 months (with Immunity Certificate) for the company from the date of closure of CFSS, 2020 i.e., 30 September 2020.

The companies will only have to pay the normal fees prescribed by Companies Rules, 2014 to file for the MCA-21 registry.

Once the company is revived, its disqualified directors can apply for removal of disqualification and reactivation of their DINs. This is currently the most preferable method for directors’ disqualification removal for those who also want to restart their old company. 

Other Remedies

There were many directors and company owners who could not get advantage from the CODS Scheme to revive their business and thus, their directors also missed the chance at the revival of their careers. The directors’ who failed to use this scheme for the removal of disqualification were left with two options.  Either they should apply in the National Companies Law Tribunal and hope to get a company revival order. Once the company was revised, they could apply for the removal of their disqualification and reactivation of DIN. In this case, when the NCLT passed the order of company revival, then RoC used to verify this order and relevant documents of the directors. But this procedure could only be followed if the companies wanted revival, the other option for directors who just wanted to activate their DIN without applying for the revival of their company was to apply for removal of disqualification in the respective High Court through a Writ Petition. The option of writing a Writ Petition to High court is attributed to constitutional rights conferred by Article 226 of the constitution to seek relief. 

How to Draft an Impeccable Writ Petition?

1. The disqualified director must undertake to use his constitutional right to file the Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution in the respective High Court. The High Court should be chosen according to the area of jurisdiction of the company. In the application, the petitioner should include the following information,

• List of date and events of disqualification.
• Affix an urgent application with a Notice of Motion. 
• Should give reasonable justification to court for not filing the statutory documents that led to the disqualification of company and removal of its name from RoC. 
• Inform Court about the current status of the company and its directors seeking relief. 
• List out the companies in which the petitioner is serving as a director. 
• File a copy of the impugned Press Release or Notice issued by the RoC that lists out the names of the disqualified directors. 
• Personal information such as name address and designation of each Memo of parties should be mentioned in the petition. 
• A prayer cause should be attached to dismiss the publication issued by the RoC under Companies Act’s Section 164 (2).

2. After this, the High Court issues orders after hearing the option for reactivation of the DIN of directors. The directors need to file the copy of the order and all other statutory documents to the RoC to continue with the process p0f registration. 
3. Once the defaulter petitioner fulfils all the required documents and completes payment of all the penalties, the RoC will start the process of reactivation. 

Hire an Experienced Representative 

Taking legal help to file a Writ Petition in the High Court is necessary considering the technicalities involved in the process. There are lots of details that should be considered before drafting the petition and only an experienced professional can handle this kind of job. Also, an expert professional from a legal firm will not only help you in the filing of the petition but also help in representing your case in the Court. An advocate from a reputed firm will attend all the hearing of the Court and put arguments effectively to ask for relief from disqualification. Once the Court grants a favourable order, the expert will help you in following the complete procedure mentioned in the order. He will also help you file all the necessary documents in RoC before activation of DIN. 

If you are worried about the outcome of filing a Writ petition in high Court or confused whether it will bring positive results, then this should serve as good news to you. There have been many instances across High Courts from all over the country where the director’s disqualification has been removed after hearing a Writ petition filed by them. The judiciary has granted interim relief to many directors and quashed orders of RoC in some cases. 

The Court is in general agreement with the aggrieved petitioners on the following points:

• Retrospective Application of Companies Act: In some cases, the Court also found the act being applied retrospectively for disqualification of directors. The Courts deemed this kind of application to be unjustified. 
• Contradictory Provisions in the Previous and New Act: The High Court finds it objectionable that the provisions of the Companies Act of 1956 did not have these regulations for the private companies and their directors, and so the new Act should not impose it on them in 2017.
• Order of RoC is Against Natural Justice: In most cases of directors’ disqualification, the aggrieved petitioners have mentioned that they never got any notice regarding their removal from RoC before the orders. Therefore, they never had a chance to clarify to RoC why they were not able to meet all the compliance standards of RoC. This is against the constitutional right of any individual as it doesn’t allow one person to show the cause of their actions and passes the order unilaterally. 

So, you can safely assume that the judiciary generally gives a favourable decision to directors who give valid reasons for defaulting. This should serve as a ray of hope for disqualified directors who are sceptical of filing writ petition for disqualification removal of their directorship. Just select an experienced legal firm that can represent your case efficiently and hope for a positive outcome.

The post What Is the Most Effective Solution to Directorship Disqualification by ROC? appeared first on MUDS.

As per the provisions mentioned in the Companies Act 2013, an director of a company can be disqualified for five years from the directorship of his/her company and also banned to join any other organization as a director if his/her current organization fails to submit their financial statement for a period of three years consecutively. Now the obvious question is whether this disqualification can be removed or not? And if it can be removed what are the ways to do it. To answer all these questions we have explored various aspects of the removal of director disqualification in different sections of this article. By the end of the article, you will be able to understand,

• On what grounds directors are disqualified from the organisation?
• Hyderabad High Court’s perspective on such cases
• What was the impact of these new provisions in the act?
• What are the remedies for disqualified directors?

We will also understand the process of removal of a director from the perspective of a directors’ disqualification removal case in Hyderabad High Court. This will help us understand the general viewpoint od judiciary on cases related to the removal of directors’ disqualification. 

Different Grounds for Directors’ Disqualification

The Companies Act of 2013 required companies to furnish documents related to their finances and operations every year. Defaulting on submission of these documents for a continuous period of three years had stricter provisions of punishment compared to the previous version of Companies Act. The act considered the director of the company responsible for actions of the company and so, has a policy of strict actions against them in case their company defaults. 

The directors of the company are responsible for the smooth operation of the company and therefore they are responsible for any action taken by the company that leads to failure in complying with the directions of Government. The following points will give information on rules or issues which can lead to directors’ disqualification,

• Any directors of the company who has been convicted under section 188 by the Court regarding party transections during last five years. 
• If the directors fail to inform about their respective shares in any company held by them alone or in collaboration. 
• If any director has applied for his/her adjudication as an insolvent or if the directors’ application for the same is still pending. 
• If the director is convicted in any offence by the Court and sentenced to imprisonment for more than 6 months.
• If the organisation fails to redeem any debentures on their due date or fails to pay the interest due.
• If the company of the director has not filed its financial statements and annual returns for three years consecutively. 
• If the company has failed to repay the deposit made to it or pay interest on those deposits. 
• Failure to pay the declared dividend and continuing so for one year or more could also lead to disqualification of the company’s director. 

• If any Court confirms that the director is not of sound mind. 
• The Court also has the authority over the disqualification of directors’ who are undischarged insolvent. 
• If any court or tribunal has earlier ordered the disqualification of the director. 

Analysis of Hyderabad High Court’s Order 

Ever since the norms for director disqualification have come into place the high Court’s throughout India are using flurry of writ petitions being filed for relief. Let’s understand how filing these Petitions have helped the petitioners in their cases through a case study of M/s. Dr Reddy’s Research Foundation & Ors. Vs. The Ministry of Corporate Affairs & Anr. 

“In this case, it was argued by the sides that the action of disqualification was considered due to non-filing of financial statements from April 01, 2014. The three years from 2014 were about to be completed only on 31 March 2017 but the date for filing of annual financial returns for the said years was 30 October 2017. The court thus, director the MCA to reactivate the DINs of the directors and allowed them to file their financial statement of their defaulting company from 2011 to 2016.”

This case paved the way for other directors to file for relief in the High Court if they want to remove disqualification without the revival of their company. Even after the CODS was over, filing of the Writ petition to remove directors’ disqualification is still the proven way to end the exile for directors. 

Ways in which Directors Can Seek Relief from Disqualification

During the initial few years of introduction of the new Companies Act, there were about 2.4 companies that were axed by the Ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA) using the Companies Act in 2017. These companies started exploring the options for their revival and the directors hoped to get their DIN reactivated. When the MCA came up with the Condonation of Delay Scheme 2018, the company’s directors hoped to get their company revived without paying heavy penalties and apply for their disqualification removal.

It is the responsibility of the company’s director to file all the financial details of the company with the Ministry of Corporate Affairs every year as per the Companies Act. If the directors fail to submit these details for three consecutive years, then the Ministry could go on to remove the company from RoC and deactivate its directors’ DIN for five years. In the year 2018, the Central Government came up with Condonation of Delay Scheme (CODS) where directors could file the relevant document to get their DINs reactivated. The scheme involved the payment of a moderate fee and condonation of hefty penalties due to defaulting on a payment. Many companies at that time used this scheme for revival and removal of directors’ disqualification. This is how this scheme worked:

• The disqualified directors were needed to submit all the statutory document with the RoC to get their DIN activated temporarily.
• The documents are submitted with the statutory fee prescribed in Section 403 of the Companies Act. 
• The small fee needed was only 30000 Rs. With an e-CODS form and so saved companies form hefty penalties. 

Present Day Remedies for relief

There were many directors and company owners who could not get advantage from CODS Scheme to revive their business and thus, their directors also missed the chance at the revival of their careers. The directors’ who failed to use this scheme for the removal of disqualification were left with two options.  

• Apply in the National Companies Law Tribunal and hope to get company revival order. Once the company was revived, they could apply for the removal of their disqualification and reactivation of DIN. In this case, when the NCLT passed the order of company revival, then RoC used to verify this order and relevant documents of the directors. This procedure could only be followed if the owners of the companies wanted to revive it. 
• The other option for directors who just wanted to activate their DIN without applying for the revival of their company was to apply for removal of disqualification in the respective High Court through a Writ Petition. The option of writing a Writ Petition to High court is attributed to constitutional rights conferred by Article 226 of the constitution to seek relief. 

How to Create a Writ Petition?

1. The disqualified director must undertake to use his constitutional right to file the Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution in the respective High Court. The High Court should be chosen according to the area of jurisdiction of the company. In the application, the petitioner should include the following information,

• List of date and events of disqualification.
• Affix an urgent application with a Notice of Motion. 
• Should give reasonable justification to court for not filing the statutory documents that led to the disqualification of company and removal of its name from RoC. 
• Inform Court about the current status of the company and its directors seeking relief. 
• List out the companies in which the petitioner is serving as a director. 
• File a copy of the impugned Press Release or Notice issued by the RoC that lists out the names of the disqualified directors. 
• Personal information such as name address and designation of each Memo of parties should be mentioned in the petition. 
• A prayer cause should be attached to dismiss the publication issued by the RoC under Companies Act’s Section 164 (2).

2. After this, the High Court issues orders after hearing the option for reactivation of the DIN of directors. The directors need to file the copy of the order and all other statutory documents to the RoC to continue with the process p0f registration. 
3. Once the defaulter petitioner fulfils all the required documents and completes payment of all the penalties, the RoC will start the process of reactivation. 

Hire an Experienced Representative 

Taking legal help to file a Writ Petition in the High Court is necessary considering the technicalities involved in the process. There are lots of details that should be considered before drafting the petition and only an experienced professional can handle this kind of job. Also, an expert professional from a legal firm will not only help you in the filing of the petition but also help in representing your case in the Court. An advocate from a reputed firm will attend all the hearing of the Court and put arguments effectively to ask for relief from disqualification. Once the Court grants a favourable order, the expert will help you in following the complete procedure mentioned in the order. He will also help you file all the necessary documents in RoC before activation of DIN. 

If you are worried about the outcome of filing a Writ petition in high Court or confused whether it will bring positive results, then this should serve as good news to you. There have been many instances across High Courts from all over the country where director’s disqualification has been removed after hearing on Writ petition filed by them. The judiciary has granted interim relief to many directors and, quashed orders of RoC in some cases. 

The Court is in general agreement with the aggrieved petitioners on the following points:

• Retrospective Application of Companies Act: In some cases, the Court also found the act being applied retrospectively for disqualification of directors. The Courts deemed this kind of application of act as unjustified. 
• Contradictory Provisions in the Previous and New Act: The High Court finds it objectionable that the provisions of the Companies Act of 1956 did not have these regulations for the private companies and their directors, and so the new Act should not impose it on them in 2017.
• Order of RoC is Against Natural Justice: In most cases of directors’ disqualification, the aggrieved petitioners have mentioned that they never got any notice regarding their removal from RoC before the orders. Therefore, they never had a chance to clarify to RoC why they were not able to meet all the compliance standards of RoC. This is against the constitutional right of any individual as it doesn’t allow one person to show the cause of their actions and passes the order unilaterally. 

So, you can safely assume that the judiciary generally gives a favourable decision to directors who give valid reasons for defaulting. This should serve as a ray of hope for disqualified directors who are sceptical of filing writ petition for disqualification removal of their directorship. Just select an experienced legal firm that can represent your case efficiently and hope for a positive outcome.  

The post 5 Reasons Why Removal of Directors’ Disqualification is Necessary appeared first on MUDS.

• On what grounds directors are disqualified from the organisation?
• Hyderabad High Court’s perspective on such cases
• What was the impact of these new provisions in the act?
• What are the remedies for disqualified directors?

We will also understand the process of removal of a director from the perspective of a directors’ disqualification removal case in Hyderabad High Court. This will help us understand the general viewpoint od judiciary on cases related to the removal of directors’ disqualification. 

Different Grounds for Directors’ Disqualification

The Companies Act of 2013 required companies to furnish documents related to their finances and operations every year. Defaulting on submission of these documents for a continuous period of three years had stricter provisions of punishment compared to the previous version of Companies Act. The act considered the director of the company responsible for actions of the company and so, has a policy of strict actions against them in case their company defaults. 

The directors of the company are responsible for the smooth operation of the company and therefore they are responsible for any action taken by the company that leads to failure in complying with the directions of Government. The following points will give information on rules or issues which can lead to directors’ disqualification,

• Any directors of the company who has been convicted under section 188 by the Court regarding party transections during last five years. 
• If the directors fail to inform about their respective shares in any company held by them alone or in collaboration. 
• If any director has applied for his/her adjudication as an insolvent or if the directors’ application for the same is still pending. 
• If the director is convicted in any offence by the Court and sentenced to imprisonment for more than 6 months.
• If the organisation fails to redeem any debentures on their due date or fails to pay the interest due.
• If the company of the director has not filed its financial statements and annual returns for three years consecutively. 
• If the company has failed to repay the deposit made to it or pay interest on those deposits. 
• Failure to pay the declared dividend and continuing so for one year or more could also lead to disqualification of the company’s director. 

• If any Court confirms that the director is not of sound mind. 
• The Court also has the authority over the disqualification of directors’ who are undischarged insolvent. 
• If any court or tribunal has earlier ordered the disqualification of the director. 

Analysis of Hyderabad High Court’s Order 

Ever since the norms for director disqualification have come into place the high Court’s throughout India are using flurry of writ petitions being filed for relief. Let’s understand how filing these Petitions have helped the petitioners in their cases through a case study of M/s. Dr Reddy’s Research Foundation & Ors. Vs. The Ministry of Corporate Affairs & Anr. 

“In this case, it was argued by the sides that the action of disqualification was considered due to non-filing of financial statements from April 01, 2014. The three years from 2014 were about to be completed only on 31 March 2017 but the date for filing of annual financial returns for the said years was 30 October 2017. The court thus, director the MCA to reactivate the DINs of the directors and allowed them to file their financial statement of their defaulting company from 2011 to 2016.”

This case paved the way for other directors to file for relief in the High Court if they want removal of director disqualification without the revival of their company. Even after the CODS was over, filing of the Writ petition to remove directors’ disqualification is still the proven way to end the exile for directors. 

Ways in which Directors Can Seek Relief from Disqualification

During the initial few years of introduction of the new Companies Act, there were about 2.4 companies that were axed by the Ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA) using the Companies Act in 2017. These companies started exploring the options for their revival and the directors hoped to get their DIN reactivated. When the MCA came up with the Condonation of Delay Scheme 2018, the company’s directors hoped to get their company revived without paying heavy penalties and apply for their disqualification removal.

It is the responsibility of the company’s director to file all the financial details of the company with the Ministry of Corporate Affairs every year as per the Companies Act. If the directors fail to submit these details for three consecutive years, then the Ministry could go on to remove the company from RoC and deactivate its directors’ DIN for five years. In the year 2018, the Central Government came up with Condonation of Delay Scheme (CODS) where directors could file the relevant document to get their DINs reactivated. The scheme involved the payment of a moderate fee and condonation of hefty penalties due to defaulting on a payment. Many companies at that time used this scheme for revival and removal of director disqualification. This is how this scheme worked:

• The disqualified directors were needed to submit all the statutory document with the RoC to get their DIN activated temporarily.
• The documents are submitted with the statutory fee prescribed in Section 403 of the Companies Act. 
• The small fee needed was only 30000 Rs. With an e-CODS form and so saved companies form hefty penalties. 

Present Day Remedies for relief

There were many directors and company owners who could not get advantage from CODS Scheme to revive their business and thus, their directors also missed the chance at the revival of their careers. The directors’ who failed to use this scheme for the removal of director disqualification were left with two options.  

• Apply in the National Companies Law Tribunal and hope to get company revival order. Once the company was revived, they could apply for the removal of their disqualification and reactivation of DIN. In this case, when the NCLT passed the order of company revival, then RoC used to verify this order and relevant documents of the directors. This procedure could only be followed if the owners of the companies wanted to revive it. 
• The other option for directors who just wanted to activate their DIN without applying for the revival of their company was to apply for removal of director disqualification in the respective High Court through a Writ Petition. The option of writing a Writ Petition to High court is attributed to constitutional rights conferred by Article 226 of the constitution to seek relief. 

How to Create a Writ Petition?

1. The disqualified director must undertake to use his constitutional right to file the Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution in the respective High Court. The High Court should be chosen according to the area of jurisdiction of the company. In the application, the petitioner should include the following information,

• List of date and events of disqualification.
• Affix an urgent application with a Notice of Motion. 
• Should give reasonable justification to court for not filing the statutory documents that led to the disqualification of company and removal of its name from RoC. 
• Inform Court about the current status of the company and its directors seeking relief. 
• List out the companies in which the petitioner is serving as a director. 
• File a copy of the impugned Press Release or Notice issued by the RoC that lists out the names of the disqualified directors. 
• Personal information such as name address and designation of each Memo of parties should be mentioned in the petition. 
• A prayer cause should be attached to dismiss the publication issued by the RoC under Companies Act’s Section 164 (2).

2. After this, the High Court issues orders after hearing the option for reactivation of the DIN of directors. The directors need to file the copy of the order and all other statutory documents to the RoC to continue with the process p0f registration. 
3. Once the defaulter petitioner fulfils all the required documents and completes payment of all the penalties, the RoC will start the process of reactivation. 

Hire an Experienced Representative for Removal of Director Disqualification

Taking legal help to file a Writ Petition in the High Court is necessary considering the technicalities involved in the process. There are lots of details that should be considered before drafting the petition and only an experienced professional can handle this kind of job. Also, an expert professional from a legal firm will not only help you in the filing of the petition but also help in representing your case in the Court. An advocate from a reputed firm will attend all the hearing of the Court and put arguments effectively to ask for relief from disqualification. Once the Court grants a favourable order, the expert will help you in following the complete procedure mentioned in the order. He will also help you file all the necessary documents in RoC before activation of DIN. 

If you are worried about the outcome of filing a Writ petition in high Court or confused whether it will bring positive results, then this should serve as good news to you. There have been many instances across High Courts from all over the country where director’s disqualification has been removed after hearing on Writ petition filed by them. The judiciary has granted interim relief to many directors and, quashed orders of RoC in some cases. 

The Court is in general agreement with the aggrieved petitioners on the following points:

• Retrospective Application of Companies Act: In some cases, the Court also found the act being applied retrospectively for disqualification of directors. The Courts deemed this kind of application of act as unjustified. 
• Contradictory Provisions in the Previous and New Act: The High Court finds it objectionable that the provisions of the Companies Act of 1956 did not have these regulations for the private companies and their directors, and so the new Act should not impose it on them in 2017.
• Order of RoC is Against Natural Justice: In most cases of directors’ disqualification, the aggrieved petitioners have mentioned that they never got any notice regarding their removal from RoC before the orders. Therefore, they never had a chance to clarify to RoC why they were not able to meet all the compliance standards of RoC. This is against the constitutional right of any individual as it doesn’t allow one person to show the cause of their actions and passes the order unilaterally. 

So, you can safely assume that the judiciary generally gives a favourable decision to directors who give valid reasons for defaulting. This should serve as a ray of hope for disqualified directors who are sceptical of filing writ petition for disqualification removal of their directorship. Just select an experienced legal firm that can represent your case efficiently and hope for a positive outcome.  

The post Can Director Disqualification Due to Non-Filing of Financial Statement be Removed? appeared first on MUDS.

Is Your Career On Pause?

Has your career come to a standstill because of your deactivated DIN? Your thriving career is facing uncertainty for five long years?

Strike off of one company has left you without the future, as you are disqualified from all others!

Why Facing Director Disqualification?

The implementation of Companies Act 2013, has seen some major changes from the previous Act of 1956. One of them is that there can be any number of directors in a company, full-time or part-time, but all of them fall under the category of ‘Officers’. There are provisions for much more strict action against an erring director, considering he is responsible for the running of the company.

The Companies Act, 2013, lays down the factors which lead to disqualification of a company’s director.

Section 164(2) enumerates that no person who is or has been a director of a company which-

• has not filed financial statements, or annual returns for a continuous period of three financial years; or
• has failed to repay the deposits accepted by it, or pay interest thereon; or
• to redeem any debentures on the due date or pay the interest due thereon; or
• pay any dividend declared and such failure to pay or redeem continues for one year or more,

shall be eligible to be re-appointed as a director of that company or appointed in other company for a period of five years from the date on which the said company fails to do so.

Awaiting The Restoration of Company?

If your disqualification has occurred due to a company being struck off by the Registrar of Companies (ROC) for defaulting on financial compliances, then your career is at stake for five years.

Are you twiddling your thumbs, waiting for the revival of Strike Off Company, so that you can restore your DIN?

Your Company is Not Yet Revived?

The 2.4 lakh companies that faced the axe of MCA in 2017, started exploring options for revival of company at the earliest. Many took the route of Condonation of Delay Scheme, 2018, a window which was opened for a limited period to help such companies. Others applied to the NCLT with a plea for revival, and based on the merits was dealt with.

But there are still many of such companies who have not been able to revive or are not inclined towards it. The director/s of such entities are left in the lurch for no mistake of their own.

Then are you counting the days until the company revives or five years of exile is over?

Be Informed of Possible Recourse To Resurrect Your Career!

Don’t be misled by the fact that the Companies Act 2013 has no remedy for people like you; there is still a remedial measure that can be taken up by you for the restoration of DIN, and that is filing a Writ Petition in the Hon’ble High Court.

It is imperative whether the struck off a company is unable to revive or not interested in doing so, Article 226 of the Constitution bestows upon you the right to file a writ petition and seek relief.

How to File A Writ Petition?

Taking professional help would be the best way to file a Writ Petition, as it is a legal procedure.

There are lots of minute details to be kept in mind while drafting a Writ Petition, and only an experienced professional in the field can do it best.

All details of the matter are required to be incorporated in it for better clarity.

Once it is filed, follow-up needs to be done, like appearances in the court on hearings, represent your case, etc. The advocate appointed by you will pursue till the Final Order is granted.

His responsibility will not end here, he will then file the High Court Order with the respective ROC. Furthermore, he will file the pending compliances with the ROC and remove the last hurdle of your path.

Once all these are done successfully, then DIN activation will be done and in this manner the professional will assist you completely in removal of Director Disqualification.

Hopeful Positive Outcome!

The good news for you is that already there have been many positive decisions given High Courts in response to the writ petitions by aggrieved directors.

Some have been granted interim relief till the judgement comes, others have got relief as the Court quashed the order of the ROC.

Courts generally were in agreement with the grievances of the directors on these:

a.) Against Natural Justice: As most of the companies and their directors never got any Notice from the ROC therefore, they could not clarify their stand nor were able to fulfill the compliances. This goes against the constitutional right of an individual.

b.) Retrospective Implementation of a Prospective Act: The Courts found it unjustified that some Sections of the Act were applied retrospectively.

c.) Contradictory Provisions in Both Acts: The judges found it objectionable that as the provisions of the Companies Act 1956 did not have these regulations for the private companies and their directors, then the new Act could not impose it on them in 2017.

Most of the Directors have got relief on these pleas.

Unsure About Who To Approach?

This is nothing to worry as you will find lots of firms and companies offering a myriad of such services.

The only factor that you need to make sure is that the firm should be reliable and trustworthy with loads of experience in dealing with such cases.

A thoroughly professional firm will not only be cost effective but also bring it to a conclusive closure in the shortest period.

Expedite Your Case With MUDS Advantage!

MUDS Consultancy Firm has been in this field for many years and enjoys an impeccable reputation. It has an experienced team which will take full responsibility of removing your disqualification, from initiation of writ petition to restoration of DIN. They have already helped 435 directors in reviving their career.

“All that a disqualified Director needs to do is take an informed decision today and save his career from being doomed”
-Shweta Gupta, Founder and CEO, MUDS

The post Removal of Directors Disqualification Without Revival of Company appeared first on MUDS.

Has Strike Off of The Company Shattered Your Dreams?

You are aware that the implementation of Companies Act 2013 has brought about lots of vital changes and amendments in comparison to Companies Act 1956.

One of the major clauses, under Section 248, is that non-compliance of Annual Returns and Financial Statements for the previous three years, would lead to dire consequences and the company shall be struck off. Taking stringent action on this, ROC struck off more than 2.3 lakh companies.

As a consequence of the strike off, Directors disqualification automatically triggered under the provisions of Section 164 read along with Section 167. Such directors were incapacitated from all other companies for 5 years, thus putting a full stop to their thriving careers.

If You Are Eager For Revival of Strike Off Company Then Read Carefully!

Are you distressed over the fact that you were not able to take benefit of the Condonation of Delay Scheme?

Don’t lose heart! Are you aware of other options for the revival of the Company?

Statutory provisions contained under the Act state the right to appeal to the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) under Section 252.

A favourable order by the NCLT shall result in restoration of the company’s name in the Register of Companies, giving it a fresh lease of life!

This Is The Procedure To Be Followed!

1. Who can file an application?

Under the provisions of Section 252(1), an appeal can be made by anyone, within 3 years of strike off.

Section 252(3) mandates that an application to revive the Company can be made by the company itself or a member or creditor or even a workman but should be done within 20 years.

2. Preparation of the Petition

The petition under Section 252(3) shall be filed with the NCLT in Form No. NCLT-9. Relevant documents to be submitted along with the required fee.

3. Submission of the Petition

A copy of the petition shall be served on the Registrar of Companies and on such other persons as the Tribunal may direct, not less than 14 days before the date fixed for hearing of the application.

4. Hearing by the Tribunal

After hearing the petitioner and the respondent, the Tribunal shall revive the company if it is satisfied with the reasons provided by the company.

5. Order of the Tribunal

If the Tribunal makes an order restoring the name of a company in the register of companies, then relevant directions shall be given to the company regarding compliance.

6. Filing of copy of the order with ROC

The Company shall file the copy of the order in form INC-28 with the ROC within 30 days from the date of the order.

7. Publication in Official Gazette

The order shall be published in the Official Gazette in the name and seal of the ROC.

8. Filing of documents with ROC

Pending financial statements and annual returns shall be filed with the ROC by the company.

A Dual Benefit!

The revival of the company shall result in a double advantage!

These eight steps shall not only revive the company but at the same time open up the way for the restoration of DIN of disqualified directors of this company.

Such directors can apply to the concerned ROC and get their disqualification removed with ease!

MUDS Extends Helping Hand!

Whether you want your company to be active again or you are in the lookout for removal of director disqualification, contact MUDS and take advantage of their expertise and experience.

Their success stories have brought relief to many companies and benefitted the even greater number of directors in recent past.

“Any problem should be dealt with at the earliest, letting it linger on shall only lead to complicating the matters!”
-Shweta Gupta, Founder, and CEO, MUDS

The post Process To Revive OR Active Strike Off Company? appeared first on MUDS.

The post Proposed Amnesty Scheme by the Government – Effect on Strike Off Companies & Disqualified Directors appeared first on MUDS.